View all newsletters
Receive our newsletter - data, insights and analysis delivered to you
  1. Uncategorized
November 16, 2011updated 29 Apr 2022 12:32pm

Audit-only firms a disaster: Mervyn King

Corporate governance champion Mervyn King has labelled proposals to outlaw audit firms from providing advisory services a “disaster” that could impact upon audit quality.

King, the chairman of the International Integrated Reporting Committee, is one of the most high profile opponents to audit-only firms.

In an exclusive interview with The Accountant, King said the separation of audit from advisory services was the biggest issue facing the accounting profession today.

“I believe that you need that skill to be a good auditor,” said King, a former judge of South Africa’s Supreme Court.

“You need business judgement to be a good auditor. [It’s important to have] that advisory knowledge at your disposal, either from a colleague or having spent some time in the advisory practice.”

King advocates accountants switching roles between advisory and audit during their career because “it just makes the auditor more skilful and the audit more complete and more informed”.

EC Internal Markets Commissioner Michel Barnier and US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board chairman James Doty are proposing audit-only firms and mandatory audit firm rotation among a raft of controversial reforms being debated on both sides of the Atlantic.

This could have a major impact on how professional services firms are structured. In particular, the separation of audit and advisory threatens the livelihoods of four largest accounting firms, PwC, Deloitte, Ernst & Young and KPMG, who typically generate more than a third of their fees from advisory services, often to audit clients.

Too much rotation ‘ridiculous’

The EC would also like to introduce mandatory firm rotation after nine years and mandatory re-tendering after five years in a bid eradicate a perceived lack of independence between auditors and clients.

King said rotating the external auditor every nine years was a “crazy idea” that could lead to a knowledge drain.

“Just from practical experience, I know that it takes the external auditor about three years to understand the business of a company,” he said.

“Then in the last two years they know they have to move out and that instead of PwC being the auditor KPMG is going to become the auditor then they are going to become de-motivated – it is a ridiculous situation”.

*Mervyn King will feature as one of the Top 30 most influential accountants in December’s edition of The Accountant

NEWSLETTER Sign up Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A roundup of the latest news and analysis, sent every Wednesday.
I consent to GlobalData UK Limited collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy


Thank you for subscribing to International Accounting Bulletin