• Register
Return to: Home > News > IASB issues IFRS 17 in insurance accounting shake up

IASB issues IFRS 17 in insurance accounting shake up

The profession has welcomed IFRS 17, issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), however it warned of the complexity and cost of implementation for businesses.   

IFRS 17, which will be effective 1 January 2021, will replace the interim standard IFRS 4, issued in 2004, which allowed companies to use national accounting standards for insurance contracts. IFRS 4 resulted in a variety of different approaches internationally, which proved difficult to compare financial performance for the investors.

IFRS 17 requires all insurance contracts to be accounted for consistently, therefore aiming to solve the comparison problems created by IFRS 4. Some countries will see more significant changes than others due to their varying national accounting standards previously used. The standard will create a single reporting model for 450 listed companies worldwide responsible for an estimated $13tr in assets, the IASB announced.

“The scope of this standard is limited because it applies only to the relatively restricted number of insurance companies, but they do form a very significant sector in the economy,” ACCA head of corporate reporting Richard Martin commented.

IFRS 17 applies to all insurance contracts, including those covering short-term policies (such as motor insurance) and longer-term policies (such as term assurance, endowments and annuities).  It requires insurers to provide a balance sheet valuation of liabilities, including probability weighting on future cash flow, risk, and profit of services provided. The IASB has stated that the complexity of IFRS 17 means that companies will need to start preparing for implementation very soon, as insurers will be required to estimate historical amounts when transitioning.

Many professionals in public practices or in professional bodies welcome the new standards. ACCA’s Martin called it a significant moment, while PwC global IFRS insurance leader Alex Bertolotti described it as the biggest shake up of insurance reporting for decades.

However the profession is not oblivious to the challenges ahead for their clients in the insurance industry.

Deloitte UK IFRS 17 accounting lead Mark McQueen pointed at the costs of implementation saying that for many insurers they would be “as large as those incurred in the European Union for the adoption of the Solvency II regulations - estimated between three and four billion Euros for the EU insurers as a whole”.

Beyond costs, EY global insurance finance, risk and actuarial leader Martin Bradley highlighted the complexity of implementing IFRS 17 for insurance companies. “The insurance industry will now have to change the way in which insurance liabilities are measured, with higher levels of disclosure,” he said. “These changes will coincide with other changes to the reporting for financial assets under IFRS 9 Financial Instruments, and will potentially bring more volatility in reported profit.”

EY expects that this will trigger a “landmark shift” in the financial reporting of insurers and those providing long-term contracts will be most affected. Insurers may defer IFRS 9 on financial instruments and implement both standards at the same time.

EY global IFRS 17 accounting change lead Kevin Griffith said: “Understanding the commercial impact of IFRS 17, and reconciling reported results and equity with the equivalent numbers computed under regulatory and other reporting frameworks (like Solvency II and Embedded Value) will be important. New systems and processes will have to be built and ultimately, the implications of IFRS 17 will go well beyond the reporting function.”

ACCA’s Martin also pointed at the difficulty for companies to collect and report the data differently, but added that investors and other users will also have to adapt. “Despite the long development period not all parties may be content with all aspects of the new standard,” he added. “Though we think that all should recognise that consistent accounting treatments will be a major advancement, and the imperfections perceived by some are an inevitable price that has to be paid.”

To assist in the transition, the IASB has announced the establishment of a Transition Resource Group to support the implementation of the standard. Other materials accompanying the standard will include an effects analysis showing costs and benefits, a project summary, and a feedback statement of the consultation period.

ICAEW head of the financial services faculty Iain Coke said issuing the standard was not the end of the story but only the beginning of the next phase. He believes IFRS 17 will be “as challenging as creation”.  Therefore, Coke added that the Implementation Transition Group has a very important job to do in the run up to implementation and that then the standard also needs to be tested in action.

Meanwhile, the IASB has also published for public consultation the proposed IFRS Taxonomy Update for IFRS 17, the comment deadline is 18 September 2017.

More information on IFRS insurance contracts can be found here.

Top Content

    Integration and resilience: South of the border

    The ripple effects of the Trump election, the fall in commodity prices, a political crisis in Venezuela, the peace agreement in Colombia, corruption scandals coming out of Brazil and changes in governments have all made for an interesting year in Latin America. But, as the old cliché goes, in all the challenges there are opportunities to grab. Vincent Huck reports

    read more

    KPMG out of south africa?

    KPMG South Africa is in the eye of a storm that could see the end of the Big Four in South Africa, while KPMG International is making desperate attempts to rescue the reputation of its brand both in South Africa and internationally. Vincent Huck reports.

    read more

    Editor's letter: Big four, Big spin

    Tourists roaming the South African national parks generally have stars in their eyes at the mention of the Big Five. In safari terms, the Big Five are the poster boys of tour operators: the lion, the elephant, the Cape buffalo, the leopard and the rhinoceros. The term Big Five originates from hunting; those five animals were considered the hardest to hunt on foot in Africa.

    read more

    Businesses to brave the elements in implementing climate-change disclosures

    As some businesses start to face the challenges of implementing the Taskforce on Climate Related Financial Disclosure (TCFD) final recommendations, accountants position themselves as key advisors in the adoption process, while advocating for industry initiative to make sure that the information reported is comparable at least for companies operating in the same sector.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.