• Register
Return to: Home > News > Brexit economic cost is “gobbledygook” says an ICAEW member and Tory MP

Brexit economic cost is “gobbledygook” says an ICAEW member and Tory MP

Peter Bone, a member of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) and a Tory MP told the MailOnline that the UK Treasury's economic analysis addressing a potential Brexit can be called "gobbledygook".

On 18 April the Treasury published a study called The long-term economic impact of EU membership and the alternatives.

In this study the Treasury argues that a Brexit will have a negative impact on the national economy, which could make UK households £4,300 ($6,107) worse off per year.

The Treasury's analysis considered three Brexit scenarios for the next 15 years.

First, a scenario whereby the UK would be a member of the European Economic Area, following the model of Norway. In this case the annual loss of GDP per household would be £2,600.

Second, a scenario in which EU membership is replaced by a negotiated bilateral agreement, on the same model as the agreements in place between the EU and Switzerland, Turkey or Canada. The cost of leaving the EU in this case would be £4,300.

In the third scenario, the UK relationship with the EU is exclusively based upon a World Trade Organisation (WTO) membership, like Russia or Brazil. The cost for UK households yearly is in this case £5,200.

All in all, after 15 years the UK GDP would be between 5.4% and 9.5% lower.

Bone told the MailOnline: "I've studied the document closely and we have an accountancy term for the document: it's called gobbledygook."

"You can make any assumption about the future and produce any result you want and producing complicated formulas and saying this looks very important and must be right because the Government says so and isn't this complicated - that's what they're relying on, there's just no basis for it."

Bone continued: "There's absolutely no basis and it's completely foundless but because they say it over and over again as if it's a fact, people start to believe it and that's what this Project Fear is about."

A spokesperson for ICAEW said the institute would not comment on the views that its members hold.

Asked whether ICAEW has officially taken a stand on the referendum, the spokesperson said: "As an organisation ICAEW is taking a neutral position on the EU Referendum. We will however seek to inform the discussion so that our members, as well as the wider electorate, can make an informed choice."


Top Content

    World Survey 2018: Data

    International Accounting Bulletin 2018 rankings of Networks and Associations globally

    read more

    World Survey 2018: Meet the new CEOs

    Eight networks and associations changed or appointed a CEO in 2017. International Accounting Bulletin caught up with the new CEOs to get their views on the market and their plans for their organisations. Interviews by Vincent Huck. Interviews are in alphabetical order. Moore Stephens International declined an interview, while Grant Thornton had not replied at the time of publication

    read more

    Editor's letter: Another year, another dollar

    Another year, another dollar

    read more

    New staff for the new work

    The accounting profession recognises recruiting and retaining the brightest and best with new skills requires an innovative approach to recruitment. Paul Golden reports

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.