• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Legal Watch: What to do when the competition authorities come knocking

Legal Watch: What to do when the competition authorities come knocking

The Competition Commission’s (CC) market investigation into the supply of statutory audit services to large companies was initiated in October 2011 by a reference made by the Office of Fair Trading (OFT). 

Both the OFT and the CC have expressed the preliminary view that the market is characterised by limited rivalry. The CC has identified the predominance of the Big Four as leading to possible adverse effects on audit quality, pricing and competition in non-auditing markets. 

The powers of the CC are extensive, including the ability to compel information via information requests; however the possibility of more stringent measures such as “dawn raids” also exists.
Whenever an industry sector comes under the competition law microscope this is always a potential. In broad terms, the OFT has the power to carry out unannounced, on-site inspections with the aim of obtaining relevant documentation.

Of course in this instance the risk of a “dawn raid” taking place is low, but companies should always remain prepared.

To minimise the risk precautionary measures should be implemented. At the very least a company should: (i) identify and isolate privileged information to mitigate the risk of inadvertent disclosure and a waiver of privilege issues; (ii) conduct an audit of potentially damaging material, for example by reference to individuals working in “risky areas”; (iii) provide competition law compliance training for staff. As the front line interface, security and reception personnel need to know what to say and who to call when officials first arrive, as failure to comply with the duty of cooperation can result in fines being imposed. Managing a raid effectively is equally as important. In the first instance, inform a member of your legal team and put into place your “dawn raid” procedures.

These can and should be tested with “mock” raids which your legal team should be able to organise. It is important that no document or record is destroyed or removed from the site and that the investigation is not disclosed externally. The aim, after all , is to allow the officials to complete their work as quickly as possible, with minimal disruption to the business while ensuring that they do not exceed their powers.

Jane Howard is a partner in Wragge & Co’s professional liability group. 

Top Content

    Blockchain and the Big Four: does it deserve all the hype?

    Although still in its infancy, blockchain is one of the most talked-about technologies of 2018. Will the blockchain bubble burst, or will it live up to its reputation as the ‘new internet’? Eleanor Jerome investigates

    read more

    Malaysia: Ready to show its strength

    Recent changes have enhanced the quality of audit reports in Malaysia, giving the profession a welcome opportunity to demonstrate its value to clients. Paul Golden reports

    read more

    China: Regulating the Chinese dragon

    Harsh regulatory actions and looming US trade wars have been dampening expectations in a Chinese market still full of potential, finds Jonathan Minter

    read more

    Indigenous Australians: New checks and balances

    With fewer than 40 known qualified Indigenous Australian accountants, Jonathan Minter speaks to Shelley Cable from PwC Australia about how increasing this number is an important part of improving the financial literacy of Indigenous communities

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.