• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Editor's letter: Barking dog lacks the bite needed

Editor's letter: Barking dog lacks the bite needed

The EU Commission just barked but failed to bite ...

It has just published its blacklist of tax havens and there are no surprises. It is disappointing and, worst of all, is of no significance and raises serious questions over the commission’s ability to tackle the issue.

The final list shows 17 countries and is the result of backroom trade-offs and lobbying. The biggest dent to the credibility of the list is that the EU Commission decided from the start not too include EU member states, allowing Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Malta off the hook.

The 17 countries on the list will probably laugh off comments made by Pierre Moscovici, commissioner for economic and financial affairs, taxation and customs, on announcing the list: “The adoption of the first ever EU blacklist of tax havens marks a key victory for transparency and fairness.”

No doubt it is an achievement to demand from others what the EU Commission is not prepared to ask of its own members and it is certainly a key victory for transparency to point the fingers at others rather than look at the mirror!

Understandably, the list met a clamour of criticism and, beyond ridiculing the commission for not looking at his own members, observers raised an eyebrow at the omission of the USA, which doesn’t comply with the international standards on information exchange, one of the EU Commission criteria for its blacklisting. Similarly, the commission didn’t screen Russia – a convenient omission?

UK based charity Oxfam published its own blacklist and said it used the EU Commission criteria. Oxfam’s list is made of 35 non-EU countries and four EU countries. Moscovici commented on this in a press conference before the EU’s list was published. He said that there were no tax havens in the EU, although there were some issues around tax optimisation, and no EU countries could be compared to those on the EU blacklist.

Notwithstanding all the above, and taking a glass half full approach, what does the blacklist mean for the 17 listed? Well the glass is half empty on this one as well. I’m afraid. Here are the EU Commission’s next steps – with comments.

“As a first step, a letter will be sent to all jurisdictions on the EU list, explaining the decision and what they can do to be de-listed.” That will make for a great BBQ starter for whoever receives it.

“The Commission and Member States (in the Code of Conduct Group) will continue to monitor all jurisdictions closely, to ensure that commitments are fulfilled and to determine whether any other countries should be listed in the future.” Scary stuff!

“A first interim progress report should be published by mid-2018. The EU list will be updated at least once a year.” More BBQ starters and excitement ahead.

A commission official told this magazine: “Stronger countermeasures would have been preferable, but we hope that work will continue in 2018 to deliver defensive measures with teeth. On our side, we will work to ensure that the measures already included in key legislation at EU level are applied. Work must continue to ensure that all countries on the commitment list abide by the promises that have been made. We look forward to work on this in the New Year and to the publication of an interim report by the summer 2018.”

 

The EU blacklist: American Samoa, Bahrain, Barbados, Grenada, Guam, South Korea, Macau, The Marshall Islands, Mongolia, Namibia, Palau, Panama, Saint Lucia, Samoa, Trinidad and Tobago, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates

 

Oxfam’s blacklist: Albania, Anguilla, Antigua and Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Bahrain, Bermuda, Bosnia and Herzegovina, British Virgin Islands, Cook Islands, Cayman Islands, Curaçao, Faroe Islands, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Gibraltar, Greenland, Guam, Hong Kong, Jersey, Marshall Islands, Mauritius, Montenegro, Nauru, New Caledonia, Niue, Oman, Palau, Serbia, Singapore, Switzerland, Taiwan, Trinidad and Tobago, United Arab Emirates, US Virgin Islands, Vanuatu, Ireland, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and Malta

Top Content

    Time pressure: Facing up to mental health

    In an ‘always on’ culture, it is becoming increasingly difficult to manage a healthy work-life balance. While companies are beginning to address this problem by introducing different support systems, Joe Pickard finds more could be done to ensure the wellbeing of the professions workforce.

    read more

    Venezuela: the race for the dollar

    With a new currency following hyperinflation, large sections of the population emigrating to neighbouring countries, an economy on the brink of collapse and no apparent solution coming from the government, Jonathan Minter finds a profession struggling to stay afloat in Venezuela.

    read more

    Brazil: transparency and control

    Brazilian accountants have an optimistic view of the impact of more-regular reporting and the implications of audit controversies for the profession. Paul Golden reports.

    read more

    Argentina: looking for a clearer view

    The Argentine accounting profession continues to grapple with the impacts of a weak economy and a culture of financial corruption. Paul Golden takes a closer look.

    read more

    Blockchain: adapting to disruptive tech

    In the relatively few years since digital currencies first began using blockchain technology, the array of potential applications has grown significantly – and continues to expand. Dan Balla, Matthew Schell and Dave Uhryniak from Crowe look at how it impacts accountancy.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.