• Register
Return to: Home > Comments > Editor's comment: Advice versus assurance

Editor's comment: Advice versus assurance

BearingPoint, EquaTerra, PTRM, Drivers Jonas, Übermind and Optimum Solutions are just some of the advisory businesses acquired by the four global accounting giants in recent years. To add to the list, PwC announced in October it is in discussions to acquire global consultancy Booz & Company, which would add around $1.4bn to the firm's annual advisory revenues.

Hopes of strong, maybe even double-digit organic growth appear to have been swept away with more pragmatic business views in recent years.

The Big Four appear to be more or less fearless of the effects advisory acquisitions might have on their business models despite, only a decade ago, the Sarbanes-Oxley regulation leading to a mass disposal of advisory capabilities of three of the Big Four firms. Since then, all firms have to some extent rebuilt their advisory capabilities or strengthened what was left of the old ones, but debates about whether to restrict the offering of non-audit services by audit firms are still very much active.

The EU is currently discussing such measures and potentially creating an additional 'blacklist of non-audit services' and several countries around the world have raised the issue and questioned the potential conflict of interest that could arise with providing advice to an audit client.

Despite such concerns, advisory has almost started to overtake assurance revenues in many Big Four firms. Globally, Deloitte is currently the only firm with higher advisory revenues than assurance, but in Australia, for example, PwC's and EY's assurance revenues only account for 31% and 35% of overall revenues respectively. The Big Four also vigorously argue that non-audit services and having a board skill set at the firm only strengthens the quality of audit and the standard of service they provide. ~

An increase in advisory investment at the Big Four is a likely response to the slowdown in growth, audit fee pressure and an increase in regulatory compliance, which seems to have halted audit services growth around the world.

The culture of 'more for less' has become the mantra in many countries and it appears firms are increasingly resorting to advisory work for those much-needed fees to support growth at their large international business. Advisory investments are deemed to be worth the risk for firm leaders as regulation in the market is far from decided.

Top Content

    Blockchain and the Big Four: does it deserve all the hype?

    Although still in its infancy, blockchain is one of the most talked-about technologies of 2018. Will the blockchain bubble burst, or will it live up to its reputation as the ‘new internet’? Eleanor Jerome investigates

    read more

    Malaysia: Ready to show its strength

    Recent changes have enhanced the quality of audit reports in Malaysia, giving the profession a welcome opportunity to demonstrate its value to clients. Paul Golden reports

    read more

    China: Regulating the Chinese dragon

    Harsh regulatory actions and looming US trade wars have been dampening expectations in a Chinese market still full of potential, finds Jonathan Minter

    read more

    Indigenous Australians: New checks and balances

    With fewer than 40 known qualified Indigenous Australian accountants, Jonathan Minter speaks to Shelley Cable from PwC Australia about how increasing this number is an important part of improving the financial literacy of Indigenous communities

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.