• Register
Return to: Home > News > Regulation > USA Congress buries transparency and anti-corruption requirements for USA listed extractive companies

USA Congress buries transparency and anti-corruption requirements for USA listed extractive companies

On 3 February, the Congress of the USA voted to dismantle the SEC implementation of Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act 2010, a transparency and anti-corruption rule mandating USA listed extractive companies to disclose payments of $100,000 or more made to the foreign governments where they do business at project level during one fiscal year.

The SEC rule had been in the making for many years but due to resistance, mainly from the USA extractive Industry, it was only issued in June 2016. In the meantime, similar disclosure rules have been introduced in the European Union, Norway and Canada.

The SEC implementation of the transparency rule had been a bipartisan initiative sponsored by Democrat Senator Ben Cardin and former Republican Senator Richard Lugar, also known as the Cardin-Lugar coalition, that gathered the support from user of financial statements, in particular institutional investors.

In order to promote comparability, all the reporting regimes (the USA one now being repealed, as well as those in Canada and Europe), allowed to report these payments using the standard of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative (EITI).

On 1 February the House of Representatives voted 235-187 to repeal Section 1504 and the Senate followed suite on 3 February.

 The American Petroleum Institute, an industry lobby group, had successfully sued the SEC's implementation on the grounds that it puts USA listed companies at a competitive disadvantage as it requires them to disclose confidential information to foreign competitors.

This legal challenge in the courts forced the redraft of the implementation rules, which were finalised in 2016. This delay enabled Republicans at the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives to promote a motion of disapproval using the mechanism of the Congressional Review Act. This grants powers to overturn rules of federal agencies recently finalized by an outgoing administration.

In December 2015, at the time of the consultation launched to seek feedback, SEC commissioner and now acting chair Michael Piwowar, expressed opposition to the proposed rules and issued a dissenting statement. Michael Piwowar said that such a disclosure regime was contrary to the SEC's core mission, which must serve investors and not special interests.

"Provisions such as Section 1504 have nothing to do with helping investors. This is yet another situation where politically-connected special interests are using shareholder resources to push their own agenda.

"There is no difference between a company executive who takes resources out of the corporate treasury for his or her own self-interest and a special interest group that does the same," Piwowar said.

He also noted that the rules could put publicly-traded companies at a competitive disadvantage compared to private and foreign companies that are not subject to the SEC's oversight.

The fact that those companies would not be subject to the rule, Piwowar said, "actually undercuts the transparency objectives of Section 1504."

He also expressed concerns over the project-level payment information.

"That information might be used by third-party actors, including non-profit and non-governmental organizations, as a means to extract their own payments in return for not opposing various projects throughout the world."

However, an investor coalition representing $5.6 trillion in AUM that commended the SEC for its leadership in implementing Section 1504 as "the rules were carefully considered and reflected investors’ substantial interest in oil, gas and mining industry payment transparency."

The coalition of institutional investors added: "The SEC’s leadership encouraged the development of a public global disclosure standard that includes the European Union Transparency Directive and regulation under development in Canada.

Top Content

    Time pressure: Facing up to mental health

    In an ‘always on’ culture, it is becoming increasingly difficult to manage a healthy work-life balance. While companies are beginning to address this problem by introducing different support systems, Joe Pickard finds more could be done to ensure the wellbeing of the professions workforce.

    read more

    Venezuela: the race for the dollar

    With a new currency following hyperinflation, large sections of the population emigrating to neighbouring countries, an economy on the brink of collapse and no apparent solution coming from the government, Jonathan Minter finds a profession struggling to stay afloat in Venezuela.

    read more

    Brazil: transparency and control

    Brazilian accountants have an optimistic view of the impact of more-regular reporting and the implications of audit controversies for the profession. Paul Golden reports.

    read more

    Argentina: looking for a clearer view

    The Argentine accounting profession continues to grapple with the impacts of a weak economy and a culture of financial corruption. Paul Golden takes a closer look.

    read more

    Blockchain: adapting to disruptive tech

    In the relatively few years since digital currencies first began using blockchain technology, the array of potential applications has grown significantly – and continues to expand. Dan Balla, Matthew Schell and Dave Uhryniak from Crowe look at how it impacts accountancy.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.