• Register
Return to: Home > News > Big Four > US and Chinese regulatory standoff continues

US and Chinese regulatory standoff continues

The US Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) has again granted an extension order to the court hearings on the six months ban prohibiting Big Four Chinese firms to provide services to US listed Chinese companies.

This is the third extension order issued by the SEC in this matter since January 2014 when a SEC Judge ruled that all of the Big Four Chinese joint ventures as well as BDO former Chinese firm, DaHua, had violated the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and that they should be banned from working for any US-listed Chinese companies for the next six months.

The Big Four Chinese firms and the SEC Division of Enforcement have been negotiating a settlement since the ruling and the SEC repeated extension orders suggest that progress is being made.

However, parallel to this negotiation, US Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) negotiations for regulatory access to China have been ongoing for a decade.

According to Peking University's Guanghua School of Management professor Paul Gillis this could be a regulatory impasse.

In his latest blog Gillis wrote that the issue remained straightforward. "The PCAOB wants to do joint inspections side by side with Chinese regulators, while China wants the PCAOB to accept their work. The SEC wants unfettered access to documents related to US listed Chinese companies while China wants to prevent disclosure of information that could be harmful to China's interests," he wrote.

"The positions of all parties are reasonable, and there is little scope for anyone to compromise."

In July, PCAOB chairman James Doty told The Accountant the US regulator was hopeful for an imminent agreement.

"We had very important and productive meetings with both China's Securities Regulatory Commission and the Ministry of Finance," he said. "I also believe the PCAOB was able to reach a joint commitment with both of those regulatory agencies to move forward with a cooperation that would enable us to conduct the first inspection of a PCAOB-registered mainland Chinese audit firm before the end of the year."

With the end of the year fast approaching seems the regulatory impasse described by Gillis is still very much a reality. However Gillis believes Chinese and US regulators will ultimately reach an agreement, but that it might not be to the US advantage.

"I believe that Chinese regulators will have the upper hand in these negotiations. Knowing that U.S. regulators are unlikely to delist Chinese stocks, they will seek a deal that gives up no meaningful turf while allowing US regulators to save face," he wrote. "Since the PCAOB and SEC appear to be negotiating separately, Chinese regulators are likely to play them off each other."

Related articles:

Big Four China firms in settlement talks with SEC

Countdown to PCAOB's inspections of Chinese audit firms

 

 

 

Top Content

    MSI joins AGN and DFK in Global Connect

    A year after AGN International and DFK International launched Global Connect, multi-disciplinary association MSI has joined the group.

    read more

    Views from the Eurozone

    With Brexit looming, populist governments gaining footholds in a number of countries and movements such as the Yellow Jacket protests in France, 2018 was anything but a quite year for the eurozone. Here leaders report to the IAB on their markets.

    read more

    Eastern promise and how to find it

    With China rising as a global power, Jonathan Minter spoke with ShineWing’s Zhang Ke and Marco Carlei at the World Congress of Accountants 2018 in Sydney, to discuss the cultural challenges that occur when Chinese networks look beyond their border, and the dividends available for those who overcome them.

    read more

    The UK: uncertain waves rule Britannia

    The UK’s accountancy profession is currently in a period of much uncertainty. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has released its review into the listed audit market which could cause the biggest shake-up the profession has seen in years, the Kingman Review has described the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) as not being fit for purpose and called for it to be replaced. All the while the country remains in a deadlock on Brexit negotiations.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.