• Register
Return to: Home > News > Tax > Lord Macgregor disappointed by government rejection

Lord Macgregor disappointed by government rejection

Lord MacGregor has hit back at the government’s rejection of proposals to reform the UK audit industry, in particular legislation that requires regular dialogue between auditors and regulators.

An industry expert supported the government’s standpoint, pointing out that enhanced dialogue has already been dealt with through non-legislative initiatives such as the Financial Services Authorities Code of Practice.

The UK House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee chairman described the government’s response as “not good enough”.

A key proposal widely endorsed by the accounting profession is enhanced dialogue between auditors and regulators, such as the Bank of England and Financial Services Authority, but the government does not the need to legislate this.

“Such legislation was a key demand of the committee’s report, which concluded such dialogue is ‘essential’ and ‘of the first importance’,” a disappointed MacGregor said.

“Legislation mandating regular meetings – for example, every quarter – is the only way to ensure this lamentable near-breakdown in communication between bank auditors and regulators is never repeated.”.

PwC head of UK public policy Pauline Wallace said the government did not disagree with enhancing dialogue, “what they disagreed with was the committee’s assumption that you needed more legislation to get there”.

Wallace said that the government has, on the whole, reaffirmed its policy position taken when presenting evidence to the committee earlier in the year.

The government was also critical of some of the views expressed by the committee over the role IFRS played in the global financial crisis. This view is largely consistent with the profession, who contend that IFRS had no impact on the crisis.

MacGregor said the committee was surprised by the government’s views that IFRS had no bearing on auditor prudence.

“The committee’s report concluded that IFRS has limited auditors’ scope to exercise prudent judgment. Auditors’ traditional, prudent scepticism must be promoted, whatever the accounting standards,” he said.

 

Top Content

    Blockchain and the Big Four: does it deserve all the hype?

    Although still in its infancy, blockchain is one of the most talked-about technologies of 2018. Will the blockchain bubble burst, or will it live up to its reputation as the ‘new internet’? Eleanor Jerome investigates

    read more

    Malaysia: Ready to show its strength

    Recent changes have enhanced the quality of audit reports in Malaysia, giving the profession a welcome opportunity to demonstrate its value to clients. Paul Golden reports

    read more

    China: Regulating the Chinese dragon

    Harsh regulatory actions and looming US trade wars have been dampening expectations in a Chinese market still full of potential, finds Jonathan Minter

    read more

    Indigenous Australians: New checks and balances

    With fewer than 40 known qualified Indigenous Australian accountants, Jonathan Minter speaks to Shelley Cable from PwC Australia about how increasing this number is an important part of improving the financial literacy of Indigenous communities

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.