• Register
Return to: Home > News > Tax > Lord Macgregor disappointed by government rejection

Lord Macgregor disappointed by government rejection

Lord MacGregor has hit back at the government’s rejection of proposals to reform the UK audit industry, in particular legislation that requires regular dialogue between auditors and regulators.

An industry expert supported the government’s standpoint, pointing out that enhanced dialogue has already been dealt with through non-legislative initiatives such as the Financial Services Authorities Code of Practice.

The UK House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee chairman described the government’s response as “not good enough”.

A key proposal widely endorsed by the accounting profession is enhanced dialogue between auditors and regulators, such as the Bank of England and Financial Services Authority, but the government does not the need to legislate this.

“Such legislation was a key demand of the committee’s report, which concluded such dialogue is ‘essential’ and ‘of the first importance’,” a disappointed MacGregor said.

“Legislation mandating regular meetings – for example, every quarter – is the only way to ensure this lamentable near-breakdown in communication between bank auditors and regulators is never repeated.”.

PwC head of UK public policy Pauline Wallace said the government did not disagree with enhancing dialogue, “what they disagreed with was the committee’s assumption that you needed more legislation to get there”.

Wallace said that the government has, on the whole, reaffirmed its policy position taken when presenting evidence to the committee earlier in the year.

The government was also critical of some of the views expressed by the committee over the role IFRS played in the global financial crisis. This view is largely consistent with the profession, who contend that IFRS had no impact on the crisis.

MacGregor said the committee was surprised by the government’s views that IFRS had no bearing on auditor prudence.

“The committee’s report concluded that IFRS has limited auditors’ scope to exercise prudent judgment. Auditors’ traditional, prudent scepticism must be promoted, whatever the accounting standards,” he said.

 

Top Content

    South Africa: sensing new opportunities

    It has been an interesting couple of years for the profession in South Africa. A number of high-profile scandals have brought the profession and the role of auditors into sharp public focus, brewing a distrust towards accountants and a large expectations gap. Joe Pickard reports.

    read more

    Ghana: a quest for consistency

    Ghana’s current economic profile would suggest a fertile landscape for purveyors of accounting services. But inconsistent approaches to compliance and application of standards – coupled with problems in the banking sector and consequent liquidity constraints – have created a challenging environment. Paul Golden writes.

    read more

    Drone technology: audit takes to the skies

    The movement towards a digitised era has already impacted the auditing profession in a number of ways, from blockchain to artificial intelligence. Now firms are taking to sky and using drone technology in their audits. Mishelle Thurai speaks to Big Four firms to find out more.

    read more

    SBC: a new alliance joins the market

    Jonathan Minter speaks to Paul Tutin, chair of founding firm Streets Chartered Accountants, about why the business and its European partners took the decision to launch their own association.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.