• Register
Return to: Home > News > Big Four > FRC Deloitte appeal successful due to ICAEW code of ethics "lack of clarity"

FRC Deloitte appeal successful due to ICAEW code of ethics "lack of clarity"

The FRC has overturned several findings of misconduct against Deloitte in the case of the Big Four firm's role as an advisor to failed British car manufacturer MG Rover, citing "a lack of clarity in the ICAEW's guidance" as a mitigating factor.

Following an appeal on 29 September 2014, the independent Appeal Tribunal overturned eight out of the original 13 counts of misconduct identified in a 2 September 2013 ruling and is now considering the level of sanctions to be applied.

At the time of the original ruling, the FRC cited instances of "a persistent and deliberate disregard" for the principles and statements of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of England and Wales (ICAEW)'s code of ethics.

Among the 13 counts against Deloitte alleged by the FRC, the Tribunal found the firm failed to manage the conflict of interest entailed by its dual role of advisor to businesses involved with MG Rover and its acquirers and auditor to the carmaker.

In light of the 2014 findings, Deloitte was ordered to pay a record fine of £14m, while a £250,000 penalty was also imposed on one of the firm's partner at the time of the facts, Maghsoud Einollahi.

In the latest development in the case, the Appeal Tribunal said, following its comprehensive review of the need for accountants to act in the public interest, it had concluded in favour of the need for accountants to take such factors into consideration when accepting or continuing an engagement.

However, it also identified "a lack of clarity in the ICAEW's guidance for accountants on how they should do that" and promised the FRC would continue to work with the profession to address the issue.

FRC executive director of conduct Paul George said: "The FRC welcomes the Appeal Tribunal's decision that there were some significant issues of misconduct in this case concerning the need for accountants to act with objectivity.

"Firms should identify who the client is at as early a stage as possible so that any conflicts of interests can be addressed," he explained, "In the event of a change in clients it is also essential to inform a previous client of the change and of the need to obtain independent advice."

George added: "Threats of self-interest in relation to fees must also be safeguarded. These are important measures in safeguarding and maintaining confidence in the accountancy profession and in upholding the standards expected of members."

Commenting on the Appeal Tribunal's ruling, a spokesperson for Deloitte said: "We are pleased that the findings of failing adequately to consider the public interest and deliberate serious misconduct have been overturned," adding that the findings were "entirely unreflective of the integrity and values" of the firm.

In relation to the remaining counts, the spokesperson added: "However, we accept the Tribunal's findings that aspects of our client engagement processes could have been better.

"As part of the continuous review of our internal guidelines, which have been strengthened regularly in the 14 years since this project, we will consider whether any further action is required."

Commenting on the ruling, ICAEW chief executive Michael Izza said that a fuller understanding of the details of the Tribunal's ruling should precede "any firm conclusions".

However, he added: "Today's ruling suggests there needs to be greater clarity for the accountancy profession with regard to its public interest responsibilities."

The case pertains to Deloitte's role as advisors to MG Rover in 2005.

The car maker was acquired by four businessmen in 2000 for the nominal sum of £10. Despite a £6.5m government loan, the business went into administration in April 2005, with debts of £1.4bn.

The sanction originally imposed by the FRC on Deloitte marks a record sum, well above the £1.4m PwC was fined in 2012 over its audit of US lender JP Morgan.


Related articles:

Deloitte subject to formal complaint by FRC over Aero scandal

Top Content

    MSI joins AGN and DFK in Global Connect

    A year after AGN International and DFK International launched Global Connect, multi-disciplinary association MSI has joined the group.

    read more

    Views from the Eurozone

    With Brexit looming, populist governments gaining footholds in a number of countries and movements such as the Yellow Jacket protests in France, 2018 was anything but a quite year for the eurozone. Here leaders report to the IAB on their markets.

    read more

    Eastern promise and how to find it

    With China rising as a global power, Jonathan Minter spoke with ShineWing’s Zhang Ke and Marco Carlei at the World Congress of Accountants 2018 in Sydney, to discuss the cultural challenges that occur when Chinese networks look beyond their border, and the dividends available for those who overcome them.

    read more

    The UK: uncertain waves rule Britannia

    The UK’s accountancy profession is currently in a period of much uncertainty. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has released its review into the listed audit market which could cause the biggest shake-up the profession has seen in years, the Kingman Review has described the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) as not being fit for purpose and called for it to be replaced. All the while the country remains in a deadlock on Brexit negotiations.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.