• Register
Return to: Home > News > Standards > EC AUDIT REFORM: Big Four clauses must go

EC AUDIT REFORM: Big Four clauses must go

Kreston International, Jon Lisby, Big Four lending clauses

Big Four only clauses should be banned in order to tackle the Big Four bias, according to respondents to the EC Green Paper on audit reform.

The Big Four said restrictive lending clauses, often inserted by banks, should be discouraged or prohibited while the mid-tier would like them eliminated altogether.

In a recent International Accounting Bulletin roundtable on audit reform, public policy leaders from Ernst & Young, PwC, KPMG and the leading mid-tier firms unanimously called for an end to the practice but there was not consensus on whether it should be discouraged or banned.

Not free or fair

Kreston International executive director told the International Accounting Bulletin that restrictive covenants “contravene the free and fair market that should operate within the EU”.

“The UK Financial Reporting Council has long encouraged full voluntary disclosure of such arrangements but there has been minimal compliance,” he said.

“The clauses added to the unwarranted bias and perception that only the Big 4 have the necessary quality and capability. Publishing audit inspections will eliminate this myth.”

Lisby said banks may insert restrictive covenants “to gain an additional form of insurance in the event of audit failure”.

Transparency could be improved

Pauline Wallace, the UK Head of Public Policy & Regulatory Affairs, says she is aware that restrictive lending clauses exist but the practice may not be that widespread. Wallace is against the practice but said it is not up to accounting firms to tell banks how they should operate.

Wallace says efforts should be made to improve the transparency of the tendering process, such as why audit committee chairs choose a specific firm.

The preparers, business and organisations of companies said they believe some of the Big Four bias comes from the introduction of IFRS. Their argument is that only the Big Four are able to maintain sufficient knowledge of IFRS due to their complexity and that even the some of the Big Four regional offices struggle to maintain a sufficient knowledge.   

Academics said that one of the reasons for Big Four bias might be the investors’ opinion that in case something went wrong the Big Four would have “deeper pockets”.

One option that respondents would like to see further explored is a European certificate of quality for firms that meet specific criteria.

Top Content

    The UK: uncertain waves rule Britannia

    he UK’s accountancy profession is currently in a period of much uncertainty. The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has released its review into the listed audit market which could cause the biggest shake-up the profession has seen in years, the Kingman Review has described the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) as not being fit for purpose and called for it to be replaced. All the while the country remains in a deadlock on Brexit negotiations.

    read more

    Views from the Eurozone

    With Brexit looming, populist governments gaining footholds in a number of countries and movements such as the Yellow Jacket protests in France, 2018 was anything but a quite year for the eurozone. Here leaders report to the IAB on their markets.

    read more

    Eastern promise and how to find it

    With China rising as a global power, Jonathan Minter spoke with ShineWing’s Zhang Ke and Marco Carlei at the World Congress of Accountants 2018 in Sydney, to discuss the cultural challenges that occur when Chinese networks look beyond their border, and the dividends available for those who overcome them.

    read more

    Spain: looking to widen demand

    As Spanish accounting professionals prepare for new audit regulations, the Paul Golden asks what they need to do individually and at firm level to maintain and increase demand for their services.

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.