• Register
Return to: Home > News > Standards > Auditors divided over how market concentration should be tackled

Auditors divided over how market concentration should be tackled

There is a divide among UK firm leaders on whether market concentration is a problem – an issue being debated in a House of Lords (HoL) Economic Affairs Committee inquiry.

Big Four firms like PwC have extremely strong market positions – the firm provides audit and assurance services to 37% of the FTSE 100 and 27% of the FTSE 250, according to PwC senior partner and chairman Ian Powell.

Despite this, Powell told the International Accounting Bulletin that there is still a large amount of competition in the market. However, as HoL committee member Lord Forsyth recently stated, audit firm rotation rates among FTSE 100 companies is, on average, every 48 years, while for FTSE 250 companies it is every 36 years, and 25 years for all other listed companies.

This indicates that opportunities to audit large listed clients are few and far between and if the Big Four dominate this sector it could be difficult for the mid-tier to break in.

Fit for purpose?

Powell thinks the audit market concentration issue needs to be put in perspective.

"[Audit is] a very complex product and the market does look at the scale and reach of the services it needs," he said. "As our clients have become more global and multinational, they have looked for that degree of coverage from the audit firms [they hire].

"The overriding principle is that this is a fiercely competitive market and clients and companies choose who they want to buy their services from.

"It is our job to make sure we provide really great service and quality. As people start looking at regulation, we think the right process is for the buyer of our services to have choice."

Grant Thornton chief executive Scott Barnes does not think concentration is a ‘massive’ problem but that the focus should be on what would happen if there was a failure among the Big Four.

BDO UK managing partner Simon Michaels said that if one of the Big Four were to exit the audit market there is a risk the audit industry would not be able to provide the services required, particularly among the FTSE 350, where the highest level of concentration exists.

He said it should be down to regulators, investors and the government to "sensibly" de-risk the market because market led solutions, such as the Market Participants Group, have failed.

Nicola Maher

Top Content

    Blockchain and the Big Four: does it deserve all the hype?

    Although still in its infancy, blockchain is one of the most talked-about technologies of 2018. Will the blockchain bubble burst, or will it live up to its reputation as the ‘new internet’? Eleanor Jerome investigates

    read more

    Malaysia: Ready to show its strength

    Recent changes have enhanced the quality of audit reports in Malaysia, giving the profession a welcome opportunity to demonstrate its value to clients. Paul Golden reports

    read more

    China: Regulating the Chinese dragon

    Harsh regulatory actions and looming US trade wars have been dampening expectations in a Chinese market still full of potential, finds Jonathan Minter

    read more

    Indigenous Australians: New checks and balances

    With fewer than 40 known qualified Indigenous Australian accountants, Jonathan Minter speaks to Shelley Cable from PwC Australia about how increasing this number is an important part of improving the financial literacy of Indigenous communities

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.