• Register
Return to: Home > News > Big Four > Adoption of FRS 115 expected to be a challenge for Singapore companies

Adoption of FRS 115 expected to be a challenge for Singapore companies

With less than a year until the 1 January, 2018 implementation deadline, many companies in Singapore will face challenges as they have not started the implementation of FRS 115, according to a survey by EY Singapore.   

The survey revealed that 62% of the 53 surveyed finance executives have not recognised or assessed the key impact of FRS 115 and only 6% have completed the process. A further 60% of the respondents shared that their organisations have yet to decide which approach to take, either full retrospective or modified retrospective - to adopt the standard. Only 2% said that their company is ready for FRS 115 adoption.

Respondents believe that the areas that will require most time and efforts in the IFRS 115 implementation process are management and financial reporting (3%), business processes and practices (18%), information technology (IT) and accounting systems (17%), and internal controls and policies (11%).

When it kicks in next year, companies will need to restate the affected comparative financial information as though they have always applied FRS 115 unless they elect not to. However, the latter approach cannot be applied by Singapore companies listed on the Singapore Exchange as for the first time, in 2018, Singapore's financial reporting framework will adhere to International Financial Reporting Standards.

Additionally, listed companies must undertake the procedure of restating comparative financial information that are affected by the application of the new revenue standard and non-listed Singapore companies, on the other hand, can choose between full retrospective or modified retrospective approach when adopting FRS 115.

Ronald Wong, partner financial accounting advisory services at EY Singapore, said: “Many companies that have undergone the implementation process have found the impact to be far-reaching through the organization. Most of the companies need to change the IT system, processes and controls. It is important that companies first understand the potential accounting impact, and go on to determine the wider-organizational impact.”

Top Content

    Blockchain and the Big Four: does it deserve all the hype?

    Although still in its infancy, blockchain is one of the most talked-about technologies of 2018. Will the blockchain bubble burst, or will it live up to its reputation as the ‘new internet’? Eleanor Jerome investigates

    read more

    Malaysia: Ready to show its strength

    Recent changes have enhanced the quality of audit reports in Malaysia, giving the profession a welcome opportunity to demonstrate its value to clients. Paul Golden reports

    read more

    China: Regulating the Chinese dragon

    Harsh regulatory actions and looming US trade wars have been dampening expectations in a Chinese market still full of potential, finds Jonathan Minter

    read more

    Indigenous Australians: New checks and balances

    With fewer than 40 known qualified Indigenous Australian accountants, Jonathan Minter speaks to Shelley Cable from PwC Australia about how increasing this number is an important part of improving the financial literacy of Indigenous communities

    read more
Privacy Policy

We have updated our privacy policy. In the latest update it explains what cookies are and how we use them on our site. To learn more about cookies and their benefits, please view our privacy policy. Please be aware that parts of this site will not function correctly if you disable cookies. By continuing to use this site, you consent to our use of cookies in accordance with our privacy policy unless you have disabled them.